Taking the stand in a rare case in opposition to a trio of British tabloids, Prince Harry was grilled throughout greater than seven hours of testimony on Tuesday and Wednesday as legal professionals for the Mirror Group Newspapers tried to argue that he had no stable proof that its journalists had hacked his telephone.

Harry’s testimony was a part of the lawsuit that he and three different plaintiffs have introduced in opposition to three Mirror titles — The Daily Mirror, The Sunday Mirror and People. On the stand, Harry detailed the anguish that press intrusions had brought about him, and stated that the tabloids printed articles with particulars about him that they might have solely been in a position to get hold of via illicit means.

The Mirror Group has denied wrongdoing and stated Harry’s claims, which associated to articles printed years in the past, have been additionally filed too late.

Here are the highlights from the ultimate day of Harry’s testimony.

Harry stated articles citing ‘palace sources’ for his private info have been suspicious.

The tabloids repeatedly reported intimate particulars about Harry’s relationship together with his former girlfriend Chelsy Davy, generally attributing that info to “palace sources” or “friends.”

But on the stand on Wednesday, Harry stated that and he and Ms. Davy, cautious of leaks, had stopped sharing details about their relationship with others, together with palace officers.

“I never discussed with the palace any details about my relationship with my girlfriend,” Harry stated whereas talking a few tabloid article that exposed particulars a few tough interval of their on-and-off relationship, which lasted from 2004 till 2010.

Harry remained unflappable whereas on the stand, even throughout robust questioning by the Mirror Group’s lawyer. In one occasion, Harry stated that journalists had illegally obtained details about his mom visiting him at college, however the lawyer stated the palace had already introduced the go to via the Press Association, a news company.

Harry’s strategy to taking over the tabloids has differed from the remainder of the royal household.

A big a part of Harry’s claims have relied on his assertion that telephone hacking was taking place on an “industrial scale” at sure tabloids within the 20 years main as much as the 2011 closure of The News of the World.

Questioned about why he has chosen to take this case in opposition to the Mirror, Harry stated he needed to “somehow find a way to put the abuse, intrusion and hate that was coming toward me and my wife to a stop,” via a authorized route, versus “relying on the institution’s way.”

The palace’s strategy, Harry stated in a authorized submitting, included a secret settlement with a Rupert Murdoch-owned British media group, News Group Newspapers, associated to telephone hacking that was reached to spare Harry’s brother, William, from having to testify about private particulars in court docket.

This case in considered one of three lawsuits that Harry has filed in opposition to British news media firms. “For my whole life the press have misled about me and covered up their wrongdoing,” Harry stated on Wednesday, trying on the decide. He added that he was baffled by any suggestion that he was “speculating” in regards to the tabloids’ actions when the protection “has the evidence in front of them.”

Jane Kerr, a former editor at The Mirror, additionally took the stand.

After Harry’s testimony concluded, his lawyer, David Sherborne, questioned Ms. Kerr, a former royals editor on the paper, in regards to the news-gathering strategies that Mirror reporters used to get scoops, together with by counting on freelancers or firms that he stated had engaged in unlawful practices.

He requested Ms. Kerr about requests for info that she had made to an organization that he stated had used illegal info gathering strategies. Ms. Kerr stated she didn’t keep in mind why she had used the service.

“You don’t remember or you don’t want to remember, Ms. Kerr?” Mr. Sherborne stated.

He additionally requested Ms. Kerr if she knew how lots of the third events she was working with to acquire information — together with freelancers, investigators and news companies — obtained that info.

She repeatedly stated she didn’t know their strategies. “It didn’t occur to me that anything was unlawful,” Ms. Kerr stated. “So the main thing was to ensure that it was accurate.”

Harry described penalties for his psychological well being.

The prince stated in 55 pages of written testimony that the fixed intrusion of the tabloids into his and his spouse Meghan’s lives had “a devastating impact on our mental health and well-being.”

But for the decide to rule in his favor, Harry has to show greater than that the tabloids engaged in practices that he felt brought about him hurt. He should persuade the decide that journalists printed details about him that they might solely have been in a position to get hold of via hacking or different illegal means.