Federal prosecutors on Thursday requested the choose overseeing former President Donald J. Trump’s categorized paperwork case to reject a movement by Mr. Trump’s attorneys to have his trial indefinitely postponed, a transfer that might serve to delay the continuing till after the 2024 election.

The submitting by the prosecutors got here three days after Mr. Trump’s authorized staff made an uncommon request to the choose, Aileen M. Cannon, asking her to put aside the federal government’s preliminary suggestion to carry the trial in December and delay it until all “substantive motions” in the case were presented and resolved.

The timing of a trial is essential in all felony issues. But it’s particularly essential on this case, through which Mr. Trump has been charged with illegally holding on to 31 categorized paperwork after leaving the White House and conspiring with one among his private aides, Walt Nauta, to hinder the federal government’s efforts to reclaim them.

Mr. Trump is now each a federal felony defendant and the Republican Party’s main candidate within the presidential marketing campaign. There might be untold issues if his trial seeps into the ultimate phases of the race. Moreover, if the trial is pushed again till after the election and Mr. Trump wins, he might attempt to pardon himself after taking workplace or have his lawyer basic dismiss the matter solely.

Apparently recognizing these excessive stakes, prosecutors working for the particular counsel, Jack Smith, informed Judge Cannon that she shouldn’t permit Mr. Trump and Mr. Nauta to let the case drag on with no foreseeable ending.

“There is no basis in law or fact for proceeding in such an indeterminate and open-ended fashion,” they wrote, “and the defendants provide none.”

Mr. Trump’s attorneys primarily based their movement for a delay — which was filed on Monday within the Southern District of Florida — on a number of assertions.

They mentioned that because the case moved ahead, they meant to make novel — and presumably time-consuming — arguments that the Presidential Records Act permitted Mr. Trump to take paperwork with him from the White House. That interpretation of the Watergate-era regulation is at odds with how authorized specialists interpret it.

Prosecutors responded by saying this potential protection “borders on frivolous.” They additionally reminded Judge Cannon that it was not new in any respect, however in truth was central to an prolonged authorized battle final yr that she oversaw, through which an outdoor arbiter was put in place to evaluate a trove of supplies seized by the F.B.I. from Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s personal membership and residence in Florida.

Mr. Trump’s attorneys additionally complained {that a} first trove of discovery proof offered by the federal government was expansive — together with greater than 800,000 pages of fabric — and would take a big period of time to type via.

Prosecutors shot again, saying a couple of third of these pages contained unimportant “email header and footer information” and {that a} set of “key” paperwork that might information the protection towards the essential sections of discovery was solely about 4,500 pages.

The prosecutors additionally informed Judge Cannon that they meant to offer Mr. Trump’s attorneys with a second batch of unclassified discovery proof as early as subsequent week, together with interviews carried out with witnesses as lately as June 23 — a number of weeks after Mr. Trump was indicted. That suggests, as The New York Times has reported, that the investigation of the classified documents case continued even after charges were filed.

As for the categorized discovery proof, prosecutors mentioned they deliberate to take the majority of the categorized supplies seized from Mar-a-Lago to a delicate compartmented data facility inside Miami’s federal courthouse subsequent week for evaluate by Mr. Trump’s attorneys — although a few of them solely have interim safety clearances.

Once the attorneys have their closing safety clearances, the prosecutors mentioned, they are going to be capable of have a look at the remaining categorized data, together with some “pertaining to the declassification of various materials during the Trump administration.”

In asking for a delay, Mr. Trump’s attorneys had mentioned that his marketing campaign schedule “requires a tremendous amount of time and energy” and that these efforts would proceed till the election. They argued that Mr. Nauta had an analogous drawback since his job requires him to accompany Mr. Trump on “most campaign trips around the country.”

But prosecutors appeared to don’t have any persistence for this argument, saying the 2 males’s “professional schedules do not provide a basis to delay.”

“Many indicted defendants have demanding jobs that require a considerable amount of their time and energy, or a significant amount of travel,” they wrote. “The Speedy Trial Act contemplates no such factor as a basis for a continuance, and the court should not indulge it here.”