Thousands of staff at organized Starbucks shops throughout the nation will stage strikes over the following week, their union said on Friday, after staff in some states mentioned administration prohibited them from placing up decorations for Pride Month, accusations that the corporate has mentioned are false.

Starbucks Workers United mentioned staff at greater than 150 shops would strike over the corporate’s labor practices and its “hypocritical treatment of LGBTQIA+ workers.”

The union represents about 8,000 of the corporate’s staff in additional than 300 shops.

“Starbucks is scared of the power that their queer partners hold, and they should be,” Moe Mills, who works at a Starbucks location in Richmond Heights, Mo., mentioned in an announcement supplied by the union.

The union mentioned it was placing over the modifications to Pride ornament insurance policies, which it argued have to be negotiated, in addition to the corporate’s broader response to the organizing marketing campaign, together with widespread retaliation towards union supporters. The union mentioned in its assertion that staff had been “demanding that Starbucks negotiate a fair contract with union stores and stop their illegal union-busting campaign.”

The firm has persistently denied accusations of illegality.

Starbucks staff in a lot of shops throughout the nation mentioned this month that that they had been instructed that no decorations for the annual L.G.B.T.Q. celebration, similar to rainbow flags, had been allowed this yr, a shift from earlier years. In interviews organized by way of their union, staff mentioned the explanations assorted.

Starbucks, which has roughly 9,300 corporate-owned shops within the United States, has mentioned ornament insurance policies are sometimes particular to every retailer. A Starbucks consultant mentioned on Friday that there “has been no change to company policy on this matter” and accused the union of spreading false info.

Starbucks staff and the union say that because the unionization marketing campaign started in 2021, the corporate has extra aggressively enforced its costume code and guidelines governing the fabric staff can put up in shops, in addition to different worker conduct, as a approach to intimidate and retaliate towards union supporters.

“They’re trying to make people feel unwelcome in whatever way possible — through more strict enforcement of the dress code or anything,” mentioned Casey Moore, a union spokeswoman. “The Pride decorations are another level of that.”

In a sweeping ruling in March, a federal administrative legislation choose discovered that Starbucks had repeatedly violated labor law by “more strictly enforcing the dress code and personal appearance policy in response to union activity.” The choose additionally discovered that the corporate had extra strictly enforced its attendance coverage and its coverage on soliciting and distributing notices inside shops.

Starbucks has disputed the findings and is interesting the choice to the National Labor Relations Board in Washington.

Unionized Starbucks staff have staged waves of strikes within the final a number of months over what they are saying are the corporate’s delay ways on the bargaining desk and different anti-union ways like retaliatory firings and retailer closings. The administrative choose’s ruling in March additionally discovered that Starbucks had illegally dismissed seven Buffalo-area staff final yr in response to union exercise.

In April, the labor board issued a complaint accusing the corporate of failing to cut price in good religion at greater than 100 shops. It was certainly one of dozens of complaints tied to labor legislation violations that the board has issued because the union first filed petitions in search of votes in three Buffalo-area stores in August 2021.

The firm has denied the accusations and blames the union for bargaining delays, citing the union’s insistence on utilizing video-chat software program to broadcast periods to staff not on the bargaining desk.

Howard Schultz, shortly after stepping down as Starbucks’ chief govt in March, denied allegations of anti-union conduct in testimony earlier than a Senate committee.