Russian nationalist commentators mentioned Tuesday that the primary mass drone assault to strike Moscow highlights the federal government’s incapacity to organize the inhabitants for a chronic battle that’s steadily crossing the nation’s borders.

The flurry of drones that focused the Russian capital on Tuesday morning induced minimal injury, shattering some home windows in three residential buildings and flippantly injuring two residents, based on native officers. The assault’s greatest influence, nonetheless, is prone to be psychological, forcing Muscovites to confront the fact of Russia’s struggle in Ukraine, which many have labored laborious to dam from their day by day lives.

“If the goal was to stress the population, then the very fact that drones have appeared in the skies over Moscow has contributed to that,” wrote Mikhail Zvinchuk, a pro-war Russian navy blogger who posts below the moniker Rybar and has greater than 1,000,000 followers on the Telegram messaging app.

The head of the nation’s Wagner paramilitary group, Yevgeny V. Prigozhin, mentioned the assault highlighted Russia’s technological lag in drone warfare, which he has beforehand mentioned is shaping the battle in Ukraine. He additionally used it to step up his assaults on Russian protection officers, whom he has lengthy accused of incompetence.

“What should common people do when explosives-laden drones are crashing into their windows?” he mentioned in an audio message posted on Telegram on Tuesday after the Moscow assault. Using at the least six completely different expletives to explain Russian protection officers, he added: “The people have full right to ask them these questions.”

The incontrovertible fact that a number of the drones crashed in upscale neighborhoods gave specific resonance to Mr. Prigozhin’s broadside. “Let your homes burn,” he mentioned, referring to navy and political elites.

Pro-Kremlin propagandists tried to painting the muted public response to the drone strike as a present of Muscovites’ grit, and as being merely the most recent in a protracted historical past of assaults suffered within the Russian capital all through its historical past. Commentators, including Andrei Medvedev, a state media journalist and native Moscow lawmaker, argued that earlier assaults have ended with Russian victories.

President Vladimir V. Putin briefly commented on Tuesday’s drone assault, telling a reporter that Russia’s air defenses had proved ample. “We have stuff to do,” he mentioned in a video clip printed by state news media. “We know what needs to be done.”

The Kremlin’s spokesman mentioned solely that the Defense Ministry had “acted well” in responding to the assault, declining to remark additional in his day by day name with reporters on Tuesday. Russian officers mimicked the Kremlin’s line, with a governing celebration lawmaker, Andrei Gurulev, saying that Muscovites had been extra prone to get hit by an electrical scooter than a drone within the metropolis heart.

The muted response added to a way of what the Russian authorities’s critics on the suitable have referred to as a management vacuum after more and more brazen attacks on Russian territory. Mr. Putin, for instance, did not comment on last week’s raid on the Belgorod area, which led to at least two days of heavy fighting.

“The strength of the psychological blow caused by the drone attack on Moscow is not in the scale of destruction, but in the fact that the nation’s leadership has promised us not a war, but a special military operation,” wrote Igor Girkin, a former paramilitary chief who had lengthy referred to as for an escalation of the struggle in Ukraine.

“Instead of an honest conversation with a nation, we get blurry consolations about Napoleon’s conquest of Moscow: Don’t worry, everything is going to plan,” he wrote on Telegram on Tuesday. “What is the real plan then?”

Tatiana Stanovaya, a Russian political scientist primarily based in Paris, mentioned {that a} lack of wartime management was changing into more and more evident. “Everything is built on his often voiced idea of a ‘patient nation’ that understands everything and will endure anything,” she wrote on Telegram on Tuesday, referring to Mr. Putin. “Let’s see.”