Lawyers for former President Donald J. Trump on Wednesday requested the decide overseeing his prosecution on prices of risking nationwide safety secrets and techniques if he may talk about the categorized discovery proof within the case within the “secure facility” that he as soon as used for categorized materials when he was in workplace.

The request to the federal decide, Aileen M. Cannon, was an try and get round a stricter provision contained in a protecting order proposed by the federal government that may require Mr. Trump to debate and assessment the categorized proof solely in one of many extremely safe places run by the federal courts in Florida.

While Mr. Trump’s attorneys refused to supply many particulars about their most well-liked location, they advised Judge Cannon that it was “a previously approved facility at or near his residence” — an obvious reference to Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s non-public membership in Florida.

Christopher M. Kise, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, mentioned the request to permit the previous president to re-establish “the same secure area” for categorized materials would minimize down on the “immense practical and logistical hurdles and costs” of getting Mr. Trump journey to one of many delicate compartmented info amenities, or SCIFs, run by the courts.

“Limiting any discussions with counsel to the government-offered SCIFs is an inappropriate, unnecessary and unworkable restriction, given the unique circumstances of President Trump’s access to security — namely that he resides and works in a secure location that is protected at all times by members of the United States Secret Service,” Mr. Kise wrote.

The discussions in regards to the protecting order over discovery within the categorized paperwork case got here as Mr. Trump’s attorneys had been preventing an identical, however extra contentious, battle over a protective order in the other federal case he faces — the one accusing him of three conspiracies to overturn the 2020 election.

Late final week, prosecutors within the workplace of the particular counsel, Jack Smith, who’s dealing with each of the issues, requested the decide within the election interference case to bar Mr. Trump from making public any of the invention proof associated to that indictment.

As a part of their argument, the prosecutors cited Mr. Trump’s longstanding behavior of attacking individuals related to the legal circumstances towards him and drew the eye of the decide, Tanya S. Chutkan, to a threatening message he had posted on his social media web site, Truth Social.

Seizing the chance to carry the case again to their chosen protection theme, Mr. Trump’s attorneys responded that prosecutors had been infringing on the previous president’s First Amendment rights and searching for to squelch his capacity to speak in regards to the election case with the general public as he mounts his third bid for the White House.

Judge Chutkan has scheduled a listening to to debate the protecting order in Washington on Friday.

Prosecutors within the paperwork case had initially proposed barring Mr. Trump from even reviewing among the categorized discovery proof — a place that appeared to outrage Mr. Kise. Even although the federal government has since backed away from that suggestion, Mr. Kise expressed shock about it in his submitting to Judge Cannon, writing that it was uncommon provided that Mr. Trump was “the 45th president of the United States and, as such, had access to and knowledge of each and every one of our nation’s most sensitive secrets.”

The indictment filed towards Mr. Trump within the categorized supplies case accuses him of illegally holding on to 32 paperwork in violation of the Espionage Act. It additionally charged him with conspiring with two co-defendants — Walt Nauta, considered one of his private aides, and Carlos De Oliveira, the property supervisor at Mar-a-Lago — to impede the federal government’s repeated efforts to retrieve the delicate supplies.

Mr. Kise additionally raised objections in his submitting in regards to the “voluminous” unclassified discovery proof the federal government has supplied since June. That consists of multiple million pages of information, he wrote, together with about 240,000 emails and 315,130 different paperwork.

The trove of discovery proof additionally consists of some 76 terabytes of uncooked surveillance digital camera knowledge — or what Mr. Kise described as “more than eight years of CCTV footage.”

The footage was instrumental in the government’s investigation into whether or not Mr. Trump conspired with Mr. Nauta and Mr. De Oliveira to cover packing containers of paperwork at Mar-a-Lago after which to cover up their movements.