Twitter’s father or mother firm sued a number one company legislation agency on Friday for what it stated had been unjust funds associated to Elon Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of the social media firm final 12 months.

A $90 million cost that Twitter made to Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, a prime mergers and acquisitions agency, amounted to “unjust enrichment” and needs to be paid again, in response to the lawsuit, which the father or mother firm, X Corp., filed in San Francisco Superior Court.

The lawsuit stated Wachtell Lipton took “funds from the company cash register while the keys were being handed over” to Mr. Musk, who owns X Corp.

Twitter’s earlier administration employed Wachtell Lipton after Mr. Musk tried to terminate his settlement to amass the corporate final 12 months. He was unsuccessful, and the acquisition closed in October.

Wachtell Lipton and a Twitter spokesman didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Twitter has disputed different charges associated to Mr. Musk’s buy of the corporate. An advisory agency, Innisfree M&A, sued Twitter for $1.9 million in February over what it stated had been unpaid payments. Joele Frank, a public relations agency, sued Twitter in May, arguing that it wasn’t paid about $830,498 for companies rendered within the deal.

Wachtell Lipton is without doubt one of the best-known legislation companies on Wall Street, having suggested high-profile offers together with Mr. Musk’s failed effort to take Tesla, his electrical automotive firm, non-public in 2018. The agency instructions excessive charges, cementing its perch among the many legislation companies with the highest profits per accomplice.

The agency has been sued earlier than. In 2018, the activist investor Carl Icahn sued Wachtell Lipton over its work on his hostile 2012 try and take over CVR Energy. The swimsuit was dismissed.

According to paperwork submitted with Friday’s lawsuit, Twitter’s board and executives authorised the $90 million cost as a result of Wachtell Lipton and considered one of its attorneys, William Savitt, had succeeded in making Mr. Musk abide by his settlement to purchase the corporate.

By approving the cost, Twitter’s former executives and board breached their fiduciary responsibility, the lawsuit stated. Twitter’s board rushed to shut the cope with Mr. Musk and didn’t act “prudently” or “on an informed basis,” the lawsuit stated.

Wachtell Lipton was wired the majority of the $90 million price a mere 10 minutes earlier than the deal closed in October, the lawsuit stated. Within minutes of Wachtell Lipton’s receiving that switch, Mr. Musk fired a few of Twitter’s prime executives, together with its chief authorized officer and basic counsel, in response to the swimsuit.

Yiwen Lu contributed reporting.