Former President Donald J. Trump faces an increasing assortment of felony costs: There’s the indictment in New York City over hush funds to a pornographic actress, plus a federal indictment over his retention of categorized paperwork, plus another federal indictment over his makes an attempt to overturn the 2020 election, which culminated in his supporters’ storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. There’s an investigation into election interference in Georgia, too.

Mr. Trump has solid each investigation as politically motivated and legally meritless — and, with few exceptions, the Republicans trying to beat him subsequent 12 months have gone alongside.

Here is what the opposite candidates have mentioned.

Ron DeSantis

Like a lot of the Republican subject, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida has framed the costs as merchandise of a corrupt justice system, whereas providing muted criticism of Mr. Trump’s actions.

“The weaponization of federal law enforcement represents a mortal threat to a free society,” he wrote on Twitter after the indictment within the paperwork case. A number of weeks later, he advised in an interview with CNN that an indictment within the election case would present the nation “going down the road of criminalizing political differences” — and declared on social media that Washington was such a “swamp” that not solely Mr. Trump but additionally any felony defendant ought to have a proper to be tried some other place.

After the primary indictment, in New York, Mr. DeSantis sought to link the Manhattan district attorney to the liberal financier George Soros in a means often used as an antisemitic dog whistle: “Like other Soros-funded prosecutors, they weaponize their office to impose a political agenda on society at the expense of the rule of law and public safety,” he mentioned.

He has allowed that Mr. Trump might have behaved inappropriately, whereas sustaining that he shouldn’t be prosecuted.

• In a jab in March, he pointed out that he wouldn’t know something about paying off a porn star.

• In June, he said he “would have been court-martialed in a New York minute” if he had retained categorized paperwork within the Navy.

• And in July, he said Mr. Trump ought to have “come out more forcefully” to cease his supporters from storming the Capitol.

Nikki Haley

Nikki Haley, the previous governor of South Carolina and former United Nations ambassador, has shifted from an unequivocal denunciation of the primary indictment in March to an argument in July that Mr. Trump’s authorized troubles have been creating an unacceptable distraction.

She called the New York indictment a “political” prosecution. But after the paperwork indictment, she joined just a few different candidates in making an attempt to have it each methods: She said that if the allegations have been true, “President Trump was incredibly reckless with our national security,” whereas concurrently saying the case mirrored “prosecutorial overreach, double standards and vendetta politics.”

She additionally said she “would be inclined” to pardon Mr. Trump.

By the time the news broke of a possible third indictment, Ms. Haley sounded exasperated. “The rest of this primary election is going to be in reference to Trump — it’s going to be about lawsuits, it’s going to be about legal fees, it’s going to be about judges, and it’s just going to continue to be a further and further distraction,” she said on Fox News, including, “We can’t keep dealing with this drama.”

Mike Pence

Former Vice President Mike Pence denounced the New York case, calling it “an outrage.” But he has been ambivalent on the paperwork indictment and the election case. In the latter, Mr. Trump’s pressuring of Mr. Pence to cease Congress from certifying the 2020 outcomes is a serious element.

Mr. Pence initially said the paperwork indictment can be “terribly divisive” and would ship “a terrible message to the wider world that looks at America as a standard of not only democracy, but of justice.” He shifted after studying it, saying, “These are very serious allegations, and I can’t defend what is alleged.” Still, he added, “It’s hard for me to believe that politics didn’t play some role in this decision.”

In the election case, whereas he has said “history will hold Donald Trump accountable” for Jan. 6, Mr. Pence has refused to say the courts ought to.

“I’m not convinced that the president acting on bad advice of a group of crank lawyers that came into the White House in the days before Jan. 6 is actually criminal,” he said. In a CNN interview, he added that whether or not costs have been acceptable relied on Mr. Trump’s intentions and “state of mind,” which he mentioned he didn’t know.

After Mr. Trump was indicted within the election case on Aug. 1, he issued a harsh assertion, saying, “Today’s indictment serves as an important reminder: Anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be president of the United States.”

But lower than 24 hours later, he mentioned on a name with donors that he wished the Justice Department had left Mr. Trump’s destiny “to the American people.”

Tim Scott

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina called the New York indictment a “travesty” and mentioned the district lawyer had “weaponized the law against political enemies.”

By distinction, he called the paperwork indictment a “serious case with serious allegations.” But even then, he, like Ms. Haley, continued to denounce it for instance of a biased justice system.

Unlike Ms. Haley, he refused to say whether or not he would pardon Mr. Trump if elected.

Mr. Scott’s message was largely the identical relating to the election indictment, which he responded to by citing the case in opposition to Mr. Biden’s son Hunter, who was offered a plea deal. “We’re watching Biden’s D.O.J. continue to hunt Republicans while protecting Democrats,” he mentioned.

Chris Christie

With former Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey constructing his marketing campaign round his willingness to criticize Mr. Trump, the indictments have been apparent fodder for him.

After beforehand condemning Mr. Trump’s actions in relation to the riot on Jan. 6, Mr. Christie continued assaults in that vein after the election indictment.

“The events around the White House from election night forward are a stain on our country’s history and a disgrace to the people who participated,” he wrote on social media. “This disgrace falls the most on Donald Trump. He swore an oath to the Constitution, violated his oath and brought shame to his presidency.”

After costs have been filed within the paperwork case, he was additionally vital of Mr. Trump.

“It is a very tight, very detailed, evidence-laden indictment, and the conduct in there is awful,” he mentioned at a CNN town hall event. He was additionally vital of the candidates’ describing it as political, saying, “They’re playing games.”

He was much less supportive of the New York indictment. Though he didn’t condemn it the way in which different Republicans did, he argued that its allegations weren’t very critical — “I don’t think this is the crime of the century,” he mentioned — and that it might assist Mr. Trump politically.

Asa Hutchinson

Former Gov. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas has been one of many few vocal Trump critics within the Republican subject, alongside Mr. Christie and former Representative Will Hurd.

He held his fireplace after the New York indictment, saying the grand jury had “found credible facts to support the charges.” But he emphasised the presumption of innocence and added, “It is essential that the decision on America’s next president be made at the ballot box and not in the court system.”

After the paperwork indictment, nonetheless, he called on Mr. Trump to drop out of the race.

He repeated that decision when it regarded as if an indictment within the election case was imminent. “I have said from the beginning that Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6 should disqualify him from ever being president again,” he said, including, “Anyone who truly loves this country and is willing to put the country over themselves would suspend their campaign for president of the United States immediately.”

Vivek Ramaswamy

The entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy is Mr. Trump’s fiercest defender. He has repeatedly solid the indictments as examples of “the ruling party” utilizing “police power to arrest its political rivals,” and has urged other candidates to pledge to pardon Mr. Trump.

“I would have made different and I believe better judgments for the country,” he told Fox News. “But a bad judgment is not the same thing as a crime, and when we conflate the two, that sets a dangerous precedent.”

After news that Mr. Trump appeared prone to be indicted over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, Mr. Ramaswamy mentioned, “The left calls Jan. 6 a threat to ‘our democracy,’ but the ultimate threat is when politically unaccountable actors literally remove democratically elected officials from office.” His premise was that an indictment might result in use of the 14th Amendment to disqualify Mr. Trump from working.

He has additionally argued with out proof that President Biden ordered Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and the particular counsel, Jack Smith, to indict Mr. Trump within the paperwork case. “We should know whose invisible hand is guiding these indictments, which is why I filed a Freedom of Information Act demand,” he mentioned in July. The subsequent month, he mentioned he would file an identical demand over the election case.

Doug Burgum

Gov. Doug Burgum of North Dakota has principally prevented speaking concerning the indictments.

In a CBS News interview, he mentioned he would “follow every rule related to handling classified documents” if elected however didn’t focus on Mr. Trump’s actions when pressed. His marketing campaign didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the election case. In an interview on CNN, he referred to as it a “distraction” that voters didn’t care about.

His most unambiguous feedback got here after the paperwork indictment, when he advised ABC News: “People are very concerned about a double standard in this country. They’re concerned that if we have lost trust in our institutions, if we don’t believe that the D.O.J. is going to enforce the laws equally between the two political parties, that’s even more serious than the charges themselves.”

Francis Suarez

Mayor Francis Suarez of Miami expressed unease with the New York case, suggesting that indicting a former president was a “slippery slope” away from democratic norms.

“If you don’t like someone’s policies or if you don’t like someone’s personality, that’s OK — exercise your right to vote, use the democratic process to express it,” he told The Miami Herald. “And I actually think that’s a way bigger statement about what this country is and what this country should be than going after somebody prosecutorially.”

He has mentioned little concerning the deserves of the federal instances. But he did recommend, in an interview with MSNBC, that he would take into account pardoning Mr. Trump. “Certainly if I became president, one thing I would look at as president is using the pardon power to heal the country,” he mentioned.

Will Hurd

Former Representative Will Hurd of Texas has been extra scathingly vital of Mr. Trump’s habits than another candidate besides Mr. Christie.

“Losing to Joe Biden was so humiliating to Donald Trump that he was willing to let people die for his lies about a stolen election,” he mentioned after Mr. Trump introduced that he was a goal within the election case. He added that Mr. Trump’s inaction on Jan. 6, “and now being a target in the investigation, proves he’s not fit for office.”

When the indictment in that case arrived, he said it was clear that “Trump’s presidential bid is driven by an attempt to stay out of prison and scam his supporters into footing his legal bills.”

He was equally forceful on the paperwork case, calling the main points within the indictment “shocking” and telling CNN, “He absolutely could have put people’s lives at risk for not returning these documents.”

Anjali Huynh contributed reporting.